Agentic
Proposition Shaping.
Welcome to the "New Era," an Agentic Design Leader—the architect focused on designing for autonomous AI agents and complex systems — the role that requires us to bridge the gap between human intuition and machine autonomy.
This role is no longer just about aesthetics; it is about architecting trust, managing system-wide behaviour, and driving fiscal growth through automated intelligence.
i-shaped
An I-shaped individual possesses deep expertise and specialised knowledge in a specific field or domain– like typography, branding, research, or user experience and lately design systems. A narrow yet profound skill set is often developed through dedication and extensive practice. We call them subject matter experts, in other words, principals. It is profoundly mistaken to assume that their expertise limits their ability to integrate and adapt within a wider organisation. The opposite is true.
t-shaped
A T-shaped individual combines deep expertise in one specific area with an integration of design function within the organisation. These leaders often rely on a strong foundation in their specialised expertise, yet extend their knowledge and shape their skills into related areas. Because they can span multiple disciplines, T-shaped individuals thrive in collaborative, interdisciplinary settings. They communicate effectively with diverse teams and bring a holistic perspective to problem-solving.
Prompt
Prompt
Hey there, this is the default text for a new paragraph.
Description
10 Hey there, this is the default text for a new paragraph.
20 Feel free to edit this paragraph by double-clicking on it.
30 After you are done, just click on the yellow checkmark button
40 on the top right to save. Have Fun!
How far does the Agentic Design Leader need to go to thrive in the new design era
M-shaped people are often equipped with an I-shaped discipline knowledge at the principal level, with depth across multiple complementary areas of expertise, tested in vastly different environments. Their cross-functional expertise and holistic thinking yield pragmatic, durable solutions that can be delivered with less tension and faster, leading to sustainable outcomes for your business. This depth and business-wide, integrated understanding enable an agile, adaptable approach that can look beyond the immediate issue to see the bigger picture.
To choose the right candidate for your team, we cannot evaluate designers using an outdated matrix.
That is why we have asked our network of +90 Design Directors in FSTE100 companies who shape the digital products and services across aviation, logistics, transportation, education, manufacturing, broadcast and finance.
We deliberately asked the question in the three main pillars of the m-shaped leader. Not what they want from their peers, but how they shape themselves to shape others, which led to a series of extended questionnaires for existing employees and new candidates.
30 Questions
Business & Strategy.
Focus
Aligning agentic systems with market viability and corporate fiscal health.
ROI
KPI
Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) and Market Share Expansion.
Agentic Design Leader connects the dots through efficiency, pragmatic approach, and operational cost reduction ranging from 18-32%. Enabling business partners to make informed, data-driven decisions.
1. How do you define the "Unit Economics" of an agentic user experience?
2. In a shift from SaaS to AaaS (Agent-as-a-Service), how do you adjust our pricing strategy?
3. What is your 30-60-90-day plan to reduce churn using proactive agentic intervention?
4. How do you balance the cost of LLM calls against the perceived value of the UI?
5. Describe a time you killed a high-fidelity project because the business ROI didn’t scale.
6. How do agentic workflows impact our customer acquisition cost (CAC)?
7. How do you pitch the "Human-in-the-loop" model to stakeholders worried about headcount reduction?
8. What is the relationship between agent autonomy and brand liability?
9. How do we measure the "Return on Intent" when a user delegates a task to an agent?
10. How do you identify which business processes are "agent-ready" versus "human-only"?
11. How does agentic design contribute to our competitive moat in a saturated market?
12. How do you translate "user delight" into a hard currency metric for the board?
13. If an agent fails a transaction, how do we calculate the "Trust Debt" in dollars?
14. How do you prioritise "General Intelligence" features vs. "Vertical-Specific" agents?
15. What is your strategy for managing "Hallucination Risk" from a business perspective?
16. How do we transition our current "Point-and-Click" into "Command-and-Delegate" users?
17. How you’d use agentic design to open a new revenue stream in the next 12 months?
18. How do you audit the ethical implications of agents to avoid regulatory fines?
19. How do you align design sprints with the fluctuating costs of token usage?
20. What is the ROI of investing in a proprietary Design System for Agents vs. using off-the-shelf components?
21. How do you handle a scenario where an agent discovers a more efficient business process than the one we sell?
22. How do we measure the productivity gain of our internal teams using the agents you design?
23. What is the impact of "Agentic Latency" on our conversion funnels?
24. How do you design for "Graceful Failure" to protect the bottom line?
25. How do you evaluate "Buy vs. Build" for agent orchestration layers?
26. What is your approach to "Cross-Selling" through autonomous agent recommendations?
27. How does your design philosophy prevent "Feature Creep" in an AI-driven environment?
28. How do you use data from agent failures to pivot the product strategy?
29. What are the top three KPIs you would present at a Quarterly Business Review (QBR)?
30. How do you ensure the agent's "Personality" reflects the company's fiscal values?
For Takers
Download
Download a free copy in PDF format and integrate it with your design team. No strings attached, this is your journey upwards. As you'll be using one of the Design at Scaleâ„¢ products, you'll be automatically added to our monthly newsletter, where we share updates and useful case studies from our partners that use Design at Scale to grow their businesses.
Include PDF with all questions
For Givers
Contribute
Design at Scaleâ„¢ is not a fixed proposition baked in diamonds; we evolve, adjust and grow with organisations we support. If you wish to challenge, change, adjust, debate or just share your opinion, feel free to join the community of like-minded individuals that shape future organisation through design.
Powered by Circle.so
090
Contributors
At Design at Scaleâ„¢ we test all our ideas with trusted specialist.
Students
5K
Knowledge
20Y
Design at Scaleâ„¢
Categories
Data
About
Share
Internal
Collaborate
Resources
IBM PlexSan
Regular
Charcoal
Design at Scaleâ„¢ is defined by three models, which form the Method. Each model operates in a different part of the business and collects and informs parties on design and engineering decisions that have a direct impact on the delivery.
All brands and trademarks presented on the Design at Scaleâ„¢ website are owned by their relevant companies or agencies. The projects represent collaborations between designers, developers and product owners. Do not copy or publish any of the projects shown here without written approval from Design at Scaleâ„¢ (alternatively GIVEâ„¢, 9Vâ„¢) and/or relevant companies and agencies.
