;

Managing Up or Down

Featured Image

A common critique of Agile is the lack of sponsorship from the C-Suite or adjacent functions not directly producing code. In reality, a decade of evidence shows that effective managing down significantly improves managing up. Middle-weight design management plays an essential role in supporting agile teams - even when designers do not transition into product roles.

Design communities tend to split into three groups:
5% - true Agile practitioners with lived experience of balanced, functional Agile environments.
25% - sceptics who have never experienced a healthy product organisation and view any structure as a distraction.
70% - the majority, whose interpretation of Agile varies wildly based on anecdote, past employment, or inherited habits.

BOK — Managing Up or Down

Managing Up

Designers often resist agile structures (“rails”), not realising these rails are no different from a typographic grid: a foundation that supports clarity, not a constraint. Without understanding the “grid” of delivery, designers experience unnecessary tension between linear engineering workflows and interconnected design processes.

A more effective approach is dual-track reporting: two tracks, two functions, two responsibilities - aligned through Just-In-Time (JIT) decision-making. This allows teams to move faster locally without compromising organisational alignment. Delivery accelerates, and upstream visibility improves.

From Silos to Broadcast

Siloed teams protect information unnecessarily, reducing value for the wider organisation. One example: a global organisation with ~600 digital properties and ~200 CTAs across customer journeys. Standardising these CTAs once required endless meetings, competing agendas, conflicting codebases, and long deployment cycles.

Instead, our Design System team adopted a simpler model: publish and broadcast.
— A new CTA guideline was published in Confluence.
— All teams were invited to submit required variations.
— Feedback was categorised into low, medium, and high impact.
— A design architect mapped changes across the ecosystem.
— Development cycles were aligned.
— Within six months, 3.7 million CTAs were replaced across the entire organisation - without a single additional meeting.

This was achieved with a self-managed team of:
— Two design system architects
— One brand expert
— Two production designers
— One design director

No PM, no CPO, no CSM - yet full alignment, automated reporting, and transparent documentation supporting almost 1,000 employees weekly.

BOK — Managing Up or Down

The Only Way Is Up

This example demonstrates the power of self-management, shared purpose, and distributed expertise. When teams broadcast knowledge rather than protect it, scale becomes achievable - and design becomes a strategic accelerant instead of a bottleneck.

Happy scaling through design!

Hey, I’m Jiri Mocicka.
London-based Product Design Director, Trusted Advisor and Author of Design at Scale™. The method that empowers individuals to shape the future organisation through design.
If you have a question, join our Community and reach out to like-minded individuals who scale design propositions. An online Academy can help you to define teams of 01, 10, and 100, and 1% is supported by Grid Magazine and Supply section, where we bring more insights weekly on how to become a design leader in your Agentic Organisation

Jiri Mocicka

AVATAR

inResearch

127

inWriting

12

Released

310
EMT

Related.

Featured Image
How long does it take before we designers realise that our work's ultimate destiny is to understand the scale?  Very recently, one of my …
January 1, 2021
 · 
4 min read
Featured Image
Welcome to every first article of the DaS™ Academy series that focuses on designers in the team of one. Let’s start with ambition – after …
January 8, 2021
 · 
6 min read
Featured Image
Welcome to the second article of this series that focuses on designers in the team of one.  Starting with ambition, I have received many …
January 15, 2021
 · 
4 min read
Featured Image
Welcome to the third article of this series that focuses on designers in the team of one. After defining our Ambition and our Design …
January 22, 2021
 · 
4 min read
Featured Image
Welcome to the fourth article of this series that focuses on designers in the team of one. After touching on Ambitions, Beliefs and Design …
January 25, 2021
 · 
5 min read
Featured Image
Welcome to the fifth article of this series that focuses on designers in the team of one. After discussing the thinking in great detail, …
January 29, 2021
 · 
5 min read
Featured Image
Welcome to the seventh article of this series that focuses on designers in the team of one. After diving deep into more internal ambition, …
February 12, 2021
 · 
6 min read
Featured Image
Welcome to the eighth article of this series that focuses on designers in the team of one. After opening up the networking, the natural …
February 19, 2021
 · 
6 min read
Featured Image
Welcome back to our Design at Scale – Academy series, focusing on the design practice in a team of ten. Before we step into …
March 5, 2021
 · 
6 min read

GRID Magazine

Explore OUR 
Articles

Every week we bring set of stories reflecting on communication, operation and technology.

Newsletter

Subscribe.

We share our 20 years of experience in creating, managing and scaling products and services that allow individuals to shape organisations through design.

Design at Scale™

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Categories

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Data

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Share

Internal

Collaborate

Resources

IBM PlexSan
Regular
Charcoal

Design at Scale™ is defined by three models, which form the Method. Each model operates in a different part of the business and collects and informs parties on design and engineering decisions that have a direct impact on the delivery.

All brands and trademarks presented on the Design at Scale™ website are owned by their relevant companies or agencies. The projects represent collaborations between designers, developers and product owners. Do not copy or publish any of the projects shown here without written approval from Design at Scale™ (alternatively GIVE™, 9V™) and/or relevant companies and agencies.

SOC_Twitter
SON_LinkedIn
SON_Instagram
SOC_-Medium
View