;

Y24 Nº54 GRID Mag – Design system is not a brain of the organisation

Featured Image

Dear (none)Designer,

Welcome back to the fifty-fourth Design at Scale™ Newsletter – where we explore innovation and how design sparks real change in large organisations and agencies.

We often see references to the design system as the 'brain' of the organisation. Unfortunately, this misleading analogy can result in significant miscommunication within the business, leading to negative impacts on products and services that are developed in silos and not overseen by the relevant parties.

If we assume the design system is the brain, we must also agree that everyone is following what is in the design system, and that this source of truth is neither changing nor evolving. Regrettably, some design systems do operate in this way, with very slow change policies. As a result, the impact on related products and services is minimal—often due to regulation or internal politics within the organisation.

Fortunately, some organisations perceive the design system as a blood vessel, delivering the right message to the appropriate party. Stretching the muscle prompts the blood vessels to arrive and support the movement. In this way, we can observe the distribution of tokens and their classification within a solution's architecture, delivering value at the time and place it is most needed. This occurs in three distinct phases.

  1. During the initial deployment, all parties contribute to the first iteration or release of the design system. In this phase, designers, developers, and product owners have eyes on release number one. Everything is new, and it is expected that all components will work as intended. This collaborative approach enables the development of pages, templates, components, and containers in whichever way is deemed appropriate, as it marks the first iteration of the entire proposition.
  2. After approximately three to six months, the design system will have collected feedback in the form of bugs and identified items that need to be deprecated. At this stage, we move into the optimisation phase, which involves two streams: one focusing on new builds, and the other concentrating on maintenance and the adoption of the desired changes in the production line.
  3. Following a further three to six months, we reach the so-called acceleration phase. This allows all parties to understand not only the impact of the design system, but also the 'blood flow'—where and how the design system provides the most support.

Understandably, this is not merely a source of truth, but also the delivery mechanism of that truth across the organisation, empowering every designer, developer, product owner, business analyst, and even accountant to understand why we do what we do and where to find the references for it.

In a design-matured agile organisation, these three phases—mobilise, operate, and accelerate—happen relatively quickly and typically do not take more than three months each. In contrast, a traditional business that relies on spreadsheets and rigid project plans may take 18 to 24 months to deliver the first benefits of this 'blood vessel' approach after two years of integrated development.

It is often considered a fantasy that this process could be expedited even further. However, there is evidence of design teams within large organisations separating themselves from the main chain of command and forming so-called 'design units' to create new products or services using the new design system. These experiments often take less than three months, including the integration into the main structure.

However, it is important to note that after the well-recognised success of releasing version one, version two usually takes another year. Why is this?

This is because two completely different mental models of delivery are trying to find a way to work together and reflect on each other's basis for delivery, which inevitably impacts the timing and overall duration of the project.

For more information, please visit Designa at Scale™ – GRID Magazine, where you can find additional relevant articles that explore high-performing teams, self-organising teams of 001, teams of 010, and teams of 100 that deliver the value proposition within a product-led environment.

Happy scaling through design!

Hey, I’m Jiri Mocicka.
London-based Product Design Director, Trusted Advisor and Author of Design at Scale™. The method that empowers individuals to shape the future organisation through design.
If you have a question, join our Community and reach out to like-minded individuals who scale design propositions. An online Academy can help you to define teams of 01, 10, and 100, and 1% supported by Grid Magazine and Supply section, where we bring more insights weekly on how to become a design leader in your Agentic Organisation

Author's Name

AVATAR

inResearch

32

inWriting

65

Released

240
EMT

Related.

Featured Image
A little over a year ago, we delivered a basic tokenised design system for a client’s retail operation. Last week, he rang me up …
March 19, 2026
 · 
4 min read
Featured Image
Empathy as Infrastructure: The Internal User Experience of Scaled Systems The ultimate metric of any enterprise system is a deceptively simple question: Does it …
February 16, 2026
 · 
4 min read
Featured Image
The code that stands still does not reflect your agentic systems. Over the past five years, more than a thousand agentic systems have found …
February 10, 2026
 · 
7 min read
Featured Image
Unbiased Scale: Driving Corporate Alignment Through Systemic Decision-Making In a large enterprise environment, product design decisions frequently devolve into a battle of subjective opinions. …
February 9, 2026
 · 
3 min read
Featured Image
AI Design Tools Have Arrived — But Is Your Practice Ready? AI design tools are now capable of transforming a solitary prompt into a …
February 3, 2026
 · 
7 min read
Featured Image
Building the Retainer That Scales — Part Two: From Argument to Architecture Article One set out the case: the agency retainer, contrary to rumour, …
March 24, 2026
 · 
6 min read
Featured Image
The Retainer Is Not Dead — What Should You Do Instead? The agency retainer was one of the most elegant commercial inventions of the …
March 17, 2026
 · 
6 min read
Featured Image
In our digitally mediated age, user interface design is no longer a mere decorative advantage of commerce. It has become the very engine room …
January 20, 2026
 · 
5 min read
Featured Image
If Ford built the rhythm of production. Toyota taught us to improve it. And Baťa gave it purpose. Then along came digital and transformed …
March 19, 2025
 · 
4 min read

GRID Magazine

Explore OUR 
Articles

Every week we bring set of stories reflecting on communication, operation and technology.

Newsletter

Subscribe.

We share our 20 years of experience in creating, managing and scaling products and services that allow individuals to shape organisations through design.

Design at Scale™

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Categories

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Data

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Share

Internal

Collaborate

Resources

IBM PlexSan
Regular
Charcoal

Design at Scale™ is defined by three models, which form the Method. Each model operates in a different part of the business and collects and informs parties on design and engineering decisions that have a direct impact on the delivery.

All brands and trademarks presented on the Design at Scale™ website are owned by their relevant companies or agencies. The projects represent collaborations between designers, developers and product owners. Do not copy or publish any of the projects shown here without written approval from Design at Scale™ (alternatively GIVE™, 9V™) and/or relevant companies and agencies.

SOC_Twitter
SON_LinkedIn
SON_Instagram
SOC_-Medium
View