;

Business Section

Featured Image

Overview

Welcome to the third article of the 3x3 series – Confluence for Designers looking at the communication structure for medium and large organisations to achieve transparency, which leads to frictionless and smooth design delivery.

I often hear from business colleagues, 

“Why would we need to share all our updates with our team over a confluence?“ 

The reason is quite simple – transparency plays a vital role in building trust in a constantly changing environment. If you do not trust your team to deal with all the necessary information about the business, how can you trust them to build the right product for your target audience?

“In other words, there is a close relationship between those who invest the time, energy and thoughts into a #business2design relationship – so should you.” 

You do not have to go too far. Harvard Business Review is full of compelling articles about businesses succeeding thanks to the design, though very few mention the many designs that succeed thanks to the transparency of the business unit. But what does it mean in practice, and what does it look like?

I suppose in my case; it goes a little deeper than INC, HBR, coDesign or other articles. It started as a mindset of the Bata family and workers who ingrain transparency and, in some respect, so-called “brutal honesty into their weekly working routines”. Suppose a trait of all the families of that era was to survive. Sharing information about progress, ambition, challenges, and approach was vital to everyone's success. Transparency kept everyone to be involved – to care. Everyone is part of the picture – everyone is accountable. 

Let’s fast-forward a century and look at how these traits support digital product design delivery globally.

What does the business section do?

Business sections of the Confluence structure are designed for a specific function. The function of business is to define, manage and oversee the delivery. And that’s where the design integration and automation come in.

It includes the Core and Aspiration Values, Products Strategy, Road Map for delivery, and Roll-out plan. Exclusively it holds a product definition in editable (including the versioning) form. Close monitoring of ROIs, OKRs, Road Maps, budgets, planning, legal, risk and other timelines  —  you name it. All for the product owners to justify the project feasibility and all necessary aspects of the successful launch in easy and shareable form. 

“Undoubtedly, the transparency makes the team more involved in cost-saving activities – in other words, how best we can achieve X.“

To give you a little flavour of how this could help both business and design, let me bring a short story that represents the best of the business section. 

An Italian Product Owner has joined the extensively large product team. Two months later, I joined the team and worked alongside his teammates. Instead of sharing the set of word documents and excel sheets common among these professionals, I was positively surprised to receive the link to Atlassian Confluence. While going through the initial set of organised documents in a very business-oriented way, I spotted an opportunity for collaboration and co-ownership of several verticals that were tied together. 

See the fact of having all text documents in Confluence; you can run some pretty basic scripts start to simplify the overall message over +3mil words. That soon leads to consistency and joined outcomes shared across OKR, KPIs, and the overall rolling strategy for the product. Design is not a “colouring in” function but carries the definition of all core behaviours. 

After a couple of initial sessions about the proposed strategy, how the design can help facilitate transparency upstream to C-Suit and how the automated monitoring can save us time on reporting across three programmes, it led to an agreement to build a small proof of concept. 

We quickly gained control over three products’ design delivery and product strategy with this concept and soon acquired two more to build a robust, scalable platform. The following five months showed that our little ambition saved us 22% of the time on reporting and 16% on translating the information from one stream of information to another (simply copy and paste). That was pretty significant, saving two days from a five-day workweek.

The product owner gained group-wide recognition and responsibility, and the designer moved to the design director role. This only shows when the business opens up and shares its strategy and the challenges; it’s easier to adapt and drive the innovation forward with a necessary adjustment while keeping an eye on one (or many) products. 

It’s important to say here that the elementary knowledge of Atlassian products is essential. Moreover, the impact is not in the design area only. It’s spread over the weekly and monthly reporting, daily stand-ups, team and disciplines rituals and delivers a vital engagement missed in many integrated teams. 

What the business section does not?

If the business section becomes a damp-yard of PPTX, WORD and EXCEL documents is better not to have it. For a straightforward reason and its duplicity of information. If you are already working on One Drive, 365 or Google Drive and your documentation, structure versioning, especially business documentation, is in good shape (and easily accessible, linked together and connected to code), do not change it – if not all the above shows you an opportunity for transformative future.

A simple example here would be the midsize company or studio already documenting their basic finances in the business in Office 365. Copying all documents to Confluence makes no sense. Copying the documents that are relevant to the product team that creates the product or service is essential to their knowledge – especially if the information in PiD constantly evolves at the beginning of the project identification. 

Two most common questions here:
“Can we achieve a collaborative effect while identifying the product in Office” (or any other collaborative platform) – the answer is YES.
“Can we achieve an interactive document that represents the current status of a programme or product” – the answer is NO (unless you spend 3x amount of time linking your word document with Trello, Asana or Jira to get up to date updates)  

For more information, please join the Design at Scale™ Courses that explain the function, impact, and common pitfalls that can be avoided while implementing the DaS™ in your business.

Structure

Let’s look at the Confluence structure in detail:

Business

1.0 — BRAND* Hello
2.0 — BRAND* Business
3.0 — BRAND* Research

Design

4.0 — BRAND* Content
5.0 — BRAND* Experience
6.0 — BRAND* Design

Development

7.0 — BRAND* Development
8.0 — BRAND* Releases
9.0 — BRAND* Integrations

Happy scaling through design!

Hey, I’m Jiri Mocicka.
London-based Product Design Director, Trusted Advisor and Author of Design at Scale™. The method that empowers individuals to shape the future organisation through design.
If you have a question, join our Community and reach out to like-minded individuals who scale design propositions. An online Academy can help you to define teams of 01, 10, and 100, and 1% is supported by Grid Magazine and Supply section, where we bring more insights weekly on how to become a design leader in your Agentic Organisation

Jiri Mocicka

AVATAR

inResearch

21

inWriting

45

Released

260
EMT

Related.

Featured Image
The Method of Methods Design at Scale™ reframes product design development into two clear phases:— Proposition Shaping (requirements gathering, setting intent)— Solution Development (prototyping, …
April 30, 2025
 · 
1 min read
Featured Image
Scaling design isn’t about headcount. Instead, it’s about coherence. Whether you’re a team of 1, ten, or an organisation with hundreds of designers scattered …
April 23, 2025
 · 
2 min read
Featured Image
We now understand how major corporations approach product design and its place within the business. More importantly, we can see how those systems shape …
April 16, 2025
 · 
5 min read
Featured Image
Frog approached design as an ecosystem - where imagination, making, and scaling form one continuous loop. Its three-stage model - Imagine, Make, Scale - …
April 9, 2025
 · 
1 min read
Featured Image
IDEO made human-centred design a global movement. Its approach begins and ends with people. Their behaviours, frustrations, and aspirations. And turns those insights into …
April 9, 2025
 · 
1 min read
Featured Image
McKinsey turned creative intuition into operational discipline. Its Design Delivery Model brings design thinking into the heart of business performance - linking user insight, …
April 2, 2025
 · 
1 min read
Featured Image
IBM transformed corporate innovation by scaling empathy. Its Design Thinking model, Empathy, Rapid prototyping, Co-creation, Storytelling, and User Outcomes, reframed how vast organisations could …
April 2, 2025
 · 
1 min read
Featured Image
Google didn’t invent collaboration; it industrialised it. Its Design Sprint compresses the creative process into six deliberate phases: Understand, Define, Sketch, Decide, Prototype [001↘︎], …
March 26, 2025
 · 
1 min read
Featured Image
If Ford built the rhythm of production. Toyota taught us to improve it. And Baťa gave it purpose. Then along came digital and transformed …
March 19, 2025
 · 
4 min read

GRID Magazine

Explore OUR 
Articles

Every week we bring set of stories reflecting on communication, operation and technology.

Newsletter

Subscribe.

We share our 20 years of experience in creating, managing and scaling products and services that allow individuals to shape organisations through design.

Design at Scale™

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Categories

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Data

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Share

Internal

Collaborate

Resources

IBM PlexSan
Regular
Charcoal

Design at Scale™ is defined by three models, which form the Method. Each model operates in a different part of the business and collects and informs parties on design and engineering decisions that have a direct impact on the delivery.

All brands and trademarks presented on the Design at Scale™ website are owned by their relevant companies or agencies. The projects represent collaborations between designers, developers and product owners. Do not copy or publish any of the projects shown here without written approval from Design at Scale™ (alternatively GIVE™, 9V™) and/or relevant companies and agencies.

SOC_Twitter
SON_LinkedIn
SON_Instagram
SOC_-Medium
View