;

Definition of Done

Featured Image

Welcome to the Jira for Designers series brought to you by Design at Scale™ – Academy. In a previous article, we discussed the Definition of Ready and how it impacts delivery within the in-house and remote teams(↘︎Link). This article will look one step further at how designers support engineers in delivering the proposition and integrating it with the outside world. Undoubtedly, from time to time, some designers have the tendency to own things when they do not need to.  

Design Process

Process

If you believe that the DoD – Definition of Done(↘︎Link) is written for designers, you are making a mistake. This definition is mainly for our engineering colleagues, where the design function becomes purely supportive. 

In the first phase, we all co-define proposition. In the second phase, we designers co-create user acceptance criteria, functional and non-functional requirements, and other pillars of software development. This face is mainly about the contributions of designers and developers. In the third phase, the ratio of support and leadership exchange is from 80/20 to 20/80, and the leading position of design moves into the peripheral supporting function. While our engineering team delivers the code, we designers support them with additional testing(↘︎Link), assets(↘︎Link), documentation(↘︎Link) and so on. Weing them to test, retest, and observe only one say of the desired experience.

Jira for Designers: Deployed vs Integrated

Deployed vs. Integrated 

Often, we see that the design team wrongly assumes that deployed code means the “Definition of Done”. In many cases, especially in big integrations/platforms, regardless of whether the code is deployed and the pages pass all acceptance criteria, it still has to be integrated within the larger ecosystem. It could often take another life cycle(↘︎Link) before the functionality is fully out in the hands of the customer. 

It is important for any designer to see how the work has been deployed and integrated and test it against the criteria, but more importantly, how it actually behaves in the hands of the customer.

Please ask your engineering team what it means in the context of your product delivery deployed and integrated. It will help you avoid some basic misconceptions, and it will allow you to communicate a better value proposition to your client. 

Jira for Designers: Agency Time Lapse

Agency Time-Lapse.

One of the things that the design agencies usually underestimate is the time lapse between the different projects and the deployment. Often, when the feature is delivered and marked as “Done”, it doesn't mean that it is being fully developed, deployed and integrated. Often, we see when beautiful designs and great prototypes wait in the delivery pipeline for months and months before being revisited again and refactored for development prior to deployment.
One way to avoid it is to have DoR and DoD documents ready and link them to your Figma files(↘︎Link). All our boards are clearly marked with a Jira ticket that represents the delivered task while equally linking the confluence of DoR(↘︎Link) and DoD(↘︎Link) requirements.
That way, the design team did their utmost best to support the external engineering team with all definitions. If, for whatever reason, this documentation is not reflected in the development, it’s the responsibility of the CPO(↘︎Link), who is on the engineering side, and she/he takes full responsibility for delivering it or not. 

Jira for Designers: Quality Control co called QA

Quality Control, so-called QA

Even if your agency does not deliver the code and you are the only design provider, make sure that you have your own QA – quality engineers(↘︎Link) in place. This is not to blame engineers of the opposite team but to help them resolve the upcoming challenges swiftly. 

It also gives the agency extra leverage to deliver quality work that can be broadcasted and bring benefits to both integral and external integration.
Internally, leveraging better team integration and transparency helps both designers and engineers to collaborate closely and release the proposition in a shorter time, not even mention cost reduction in code refactoring. Externally, broadcasting the change helps the agency win more clients and ensures that clients have continuous support from the agency even though their work has already been finished.

Jira for Designers: Partnership

Partnership 

Conversely, in regards to achieving a quality design and quality code, an agency does thrive in a partnership where both parties hold each other accountable for
a/  quality of definition,
b/  quality of design and the overall experience and
c/  quality of code and speed of the deployment.

That way, you benefit from better integration with your partners but also bring your partner better quality for the delivery as a design agency. Please make sure this is a transparent relationship above anything else. This way, you prevent additional hassle and maintain both teams in the area of operational excellence, where both teams benefit from the partnership.

Happy scaling through design!

Hey, I’m Jiri Mocicka.
London-based Product Design Director, Trusted Advisor and Author of Design at Scale™. The method that empowers individuals to shape the future organisation through design.
If you have a question, join our Community and reach out to like-minded individuals who scale design propositions. An online Academy can help you to define teams of 01, 10, and 100, and 1% is supported by Grid Magazine and Supply section, where we bring more insights weekly on how to become a design leader in your Agentic Organisation

Jiri Mocicka

AVATAR

inResearch

21

inWriting

45

Released

260
EMT

Related.

Featured Image
Empathy as Infrastructure: The Internal User Experience of Scaled Systems The ultimate metric of any enterprise system is a deceptively simple question: Does it …
February 16, 2026
 · 
4 min read
Featured Image
Organisations trimming entry-level positions in pursuit of AI-driven efficiencies are engaging in a calculation that appears eminently rational when viewed through the lens of …
April 3, 2026
 · 
7 min read
Featured Image
Aligning Human Senses and Technical Communication to Unlock Enterprise Scale In a quickly evolving global corporate environment, cross-functional alignment is the ultimate metric of …
April 6, 2026
 · 
4 min read
Featured Image
Yes, let's begin. Where shall we start? The newsletter, articles, posts and many other forms of content are generated in order to scale your …
January 30, 2020
 · 
2 min read
Featured Image
Write the Press Release Before You Write a Line of Code Most teams write documentation to justify what they’ve already decided to build. Amazon’s …
February 15, 2023
 · 
5 min read
Featured Image
Build Down From Why, Or You’re Just Building Features Most product visions get written backwards: the feature list comes first, and a mission statement …
February 8, 2023
 · 
5 min read
Featured Image
Build the Fit Before You Build Anything Else A product doesn’t usually fail because the build was bad. It fails because nobody has proved …
January 11, 2023
 · 
5 min read
Featured Image
Make the Old New, Then Prove Which Idea Earns Its Build Most brainstorming sessions don't fail for lack of ideas. They fail because nobody …
February 1, 2023
 · 
5 min read
Featured Image
Make the Old New, Then Prove Which Idea Earns Its Build Most brainstorming sessions don't fail for lack of ideas. They fail because nobody …
January 25, 2023
 · 
5 min read

GRID Magazine

Explore OUR 
Articles

Every week we bring set of stories reflecting on communication, operation and technology.

Newsletter

Subscribe.

We share our 20 years of experience in creating, managing and scaling products and services that allow individuals to shape organisations through design.

Design at Scale™

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Categories

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Data

LINE_MAGENTA_050_301

Share

Internal

Collaborate

Resources

IBM PlexSan
Regular
Charcoal

Design at Scale™ is defined by three models, which form the Method. Each model operates in a different part of the business and collects and informs parties on design and engineering decisions that have a direct impact on the delivery.

All brands and trademarks presented on the Design at Scale™ website are owned by their relevant companies or agencies. The projects represent collaborations between designers, developers and product owners. Do not copy or publish any of the projects shown here without written approval from Design at Scale™ (alternatively GIVE™, 9V™) and/or relevant companies and agencies.

SOC_Twitter
SON_LinkedIn
SON_Instagram
SOC_-Medium
View